That sounds good. (John's comments were good, as well.) (01)
Question:
What do the 2nd, 3rd, and 400th eric armstrong's use
for an iName? (02)
Michael Mell wrote:
> I-names are case in-sensitive. I recall a recommendation somewhere that
> your most public and formal i-name should be firstname.lastname.
> =eric.armstrong would be a good choice.
>
> Mike
>
> On Dec 20, 2005, at 11:44 AM, John Sechrest wrote:
>
>>
>> You suggest by your statement that you should only have one iName
>>
>>
>> Is this really what you want?
>>
>>
>> I guess it depends on what you want to make the focus of your
>> identity. Given that hobby and sense of cute are not going
>> to remain constant, I would say that option 3 and 4 are not
>> good choices.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Eric Armstrong <Eric.Armstrong@Sun.COM> writes:
>>
>> % What makes a good iName? Some ideas that
>> % come to mind:
>> %
>> % ericArmstrong (name)
>> % ericTreeLight (website)
>> % ericTrailRunner (hobby)
>> % eric54 (where are you?)
>> %
>> % --
>> % This message is archived at:
>> %
>> % http://collab.blueoxen.net/forums/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?
>> a=yak&i=43A85AAB.90206@sun.com
>> %
>>
>> -----
>> John Sechrest . Helping people use
>> . computers and the Internet
>> . more effectively
>> .
>> . Internet: sechrest@peak.org
>> .
>> .
>> http://www.peak.org/~sechrest
>>
>> --
>> This message is archived at:
>>
>> http://collab.blueoxen.net/forums/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=yak&i=E1EonPP
>> -0006ep-7e@jas.peak.org
>>
>>
> (03)
--
This message is archived at: (04)
http://collab.blueoxen.net/forums/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=yak&i=43A87052.6080209@sun.com (05)
|