CONTINUED (01)
Just googled for RDF RSS and found myself overwhelmed as per "draining
the swamp and finding yourself over your ankles among alligators." (02)
This demonstrates that the different parts of an organization must be
able to trust in one anothers' competence. (03)
But I sense your sentiment is to avoid unnecessary informational
obstacles to get in the way of developing the story lines. Your comments
put in my mind a picture of blogs (?) done by small teams of subject
specialists, say a team consisting of someone dealing with evaluating
info on global warming, someone relating such info to political
realities and "smoothen" things out, and someone to put things in
layman's terms. Together they would enrich a "pooled" DKR with
specialist data, papers, etc. as well as with suitable summaries for
public and their representaties. (04)
Yes, the major idea is that contributors need not be part of Fleabyte
"organization." But awareness of the way Fleabyte's mode of operation
and judgment would, of course, be most helpful. This would also ease the
forming of an overall "topics finder." (I just eliminated the phrase
"contents page.") (05)
Having come to this point, maybe I should feed thoughts back into the
Yak stream. I am also strongly considering Peter Jones' suggestion to
just go slowly through the starting phase, experiment with operational
details a little instead of going whole hog writing content. (06)
Henry (07)
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 13:52, Jack Park wrote:
> So, now Henry has done a masterful job of detailing a "day in the
> life" of a participant in some imagined DKR. His very thoughtful post
> opens the doors to discussions which, I think, Yak is all about. How
> best to build a collaboratorium... <snip> (08)
--
This message is archived at: (09)
http://collab.blueoxen.net/forums/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=yak&i=1109020277.2826.18.camel@localhost.localdomain (010)
|