yak
[Top] [All Lists]

[yak@collab] Re: comments for henry

To: yak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Henry K van Eyken <vaneyken@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:24:04 -0500
Message-id: <1108682644.2956.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
John.    (01)

I apologize for having been careless with personal mail. Getting a
little soggy in the upper chamber.    (02)

Just to be sure, I much appreciate your remarks. In fact, I might well
have made some similar ones to others.     (03)

Crazy thing is, I wrote a long article about the merits of a medium
being as short as possible! But as Einstein might have said, not
shorter.    (04)

Henry    (05)

On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 17:14, John Sechrest wrote:
> I had sent my comments to henry off list, but since he mentions
> them in his note, I think it is probably correct to send them
> to the list.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Forwarded Message
> 
> Date:    Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:18:06 -0800
> Subject: Re: [yak@collab] Re: A medium for global civics 
> From:    John Sechrest <sechrest@jas.peak.org>
> To:      vaneyken@sympatico.ca
> 
> 
> Hello Henry,
> 
>       I think that the idea of driving an online magazine
>       into a specific Online tool that will enable 
>       complex understanding is a good idea. 
> 
>       And I think it is important to try to carry it forward.
> 
>       However, from a marketing point of view, it seems
>       you are seeding your own barriers. 
> 
>       Fleabyte.... How does this present an image of great progress?
>       It makes a image of something insignificant but annoying.
>       
>       How many people would read all the way to the end 
>       of your note at  http://www.fleabyte.org/Flb-future.html
>       who were not already vested in the idea and vesting
>       in the notions and culture that has been being discussed.
> 
>       In order to succeed with fleabyte, you have to aim 
>       at crossing the innovation gap between the innovators
>       and the rest of the population. Presentation, word choice
>       and style have a lot to do with that.
> 
>       In addition, you have to stop pointing at the pitfalls
>       along the way, but focus on the dream. 
> 
>       The dream is to provide an example of how to be a great
>       resource. However, most people don't care about that.
>       They care about things closer to home. So you have to 
>       present material about specific things that are of 
>       specific value to specific people. Not broad abstract views
>       of what is possible, but what can you do for someone today.
> 
>       The vision of where it can go is valueable for the yakkers
>       and the various followers of Engelbart. And we all love
>       to play in that space. But it does not capture the hearts
>       of the wider world.
> 
>       You say you need funding. What do you need funding for?
>       For a magazine? For a foundation? For a resource?
> 
>       What is the 30 second elevator pitch for what you want
>       to do. Very very focused?
> 
>       <pause and think out the elevator speach in your mind...>
> 
> 
>       Now, who wants to fund that? (what you just said in your mind)
> 
>       For any great idea or technology, it is not the technology
>       that matters for business. It is the application of the
>       technology to a problem. Some advantage is created by that
>       application, which makes it cost effective to do it. 
> 
>       Not cost effective in 5 years. But cost effective right now.
>       I give you a dollar and you save me two.
>       I give you a dollar and you generate three.
>       I give you a dollar and you empower me to earn four.
>       I give you a dollar and you make it more convenient for me to get five.
> 
>       What is the specific application of OHS which will generate
>       immediate return on investment? 
> 
>       If a group of people used your expression of OHS as a group
>       and cooperated with each other, how would they 
>       have a tactical advantage over another group doing the same thing?
>       How much return on investment would they make from doing it?
> 
>       Journalists?
>       Businesses?
>       software developers?
> 
>       IE, what market can be argued will benefit from it? 
>       How much will they benefit?
> 
>       IE, what is the return on investment? 
> 
>       How can a small company (less than 25 people) 
>       use a methodology and following that methodology make
>       more money?
> 
>       Without this kind of business plan, you can not garner investors.
> 
>       You can garner donations, but donations are hard to get
>       for abstract ideas. So it is hard to drive it forward this way.
> 
>       How can I help you turn this into a business plan that is        
>       is possible to sell in an elevator speach?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Henry K van Eyken <vaneyken@sympatico.ca> writes:
> 
>  % I like to express my thanks to Peter Jones for his careful editing of
>  % "Fleabyte: A Medium for Global Civics." The improved presentation has
>  % now been posted as www.fleabyte.org/Flb-future.html
>  % 
>  % Anybody who has read it will know that I doubt we can make a go of it,
>  % but it seems so irresponsible not to give it a try.
>  % 
>  % Major obstacles at this point:
>  % 
>  % 1. My own limited capacity and capabilities.
>  % 
>  % 2. We haven't got a project manager, whose first concern would be help
>  % bringing in the funding, etc.
>  % 
>  % 3. We haven't yet an editor who can generate and steer volunteer
>  % contributors.
>  % 
>  % I am trying to address these points. In the meantime there is something
>  % a technologically savvy volunteer in this group can do and that is to
>  % make the workings of the Fleabyte site more efficient. I mean, not tell
>  % me how, but actually do it.
>  % 
>  % I spent almost all day yesterday trying to convert the site to decent
>  % XHTML which I am told is the most likely stepping stone for future
>  % development. But (a) I have trouble recalling XHTML details (haven't
>  % touched it for about to years) and (b) I jave troubles with the Mozilla
>  % (on Linux) composer. I seem to recall that I ran into that twice before
>  % and for another job went over to handcoding on a plain text editor.
>  % 
>  % Point, however, is that one must be able to quickly move articles onto
>  % and off the front page while updating the contents bar and the
>  % click-step feature. Similar for the archives. I'll be glad to share my
>  % access id and password to the server with a conscientious, competent
>  % person who shares my notion that this work IS important.
>  % 
>  % My private email address is vaneyken@sympatico.ca
>  % 
>  % Henry
>  % 
>  % 
>  % 
>  % -- 
>  % This message is archived at:
>  % 
>  % 
>http://collab.blueoxen.net/forums/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=yak&i=1108642396.3002.28.camel@localhost.localdomain
>  % 
> 
> - -----
> John Sechrest          .         Helping people use
>                         .           computers and the Internet
>                           .            more effectively
>                              .                      
>                                  .       Internet: sechrest@peak.org
>                                       .   
>                                               . http://www.peak.org/~sechrest
> 
> ------- End of Forwarded Message    (06)

-- 
This message is archived at:    (07)

http://collab.blueoxen.net/forums/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=yak&i=1108682644.2956.3.camel@localhost.localdomain    (08)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>