A sudden thought - is SharedIntensity actually "generated", or does it
"emerge"? (01)
Eugene Eric Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 10:55:43PM -0700, Eugene Eric Kim wrote:
>
>
>>Towards the end of the evening, Brian posed an idea that got
>>everyone's attention. He calls it "grass roots peer review," and it
>>sparked a high-intensity discussion. Brian, I took the liberty of
>>creating a Wiki page for it:
>>
>> http://collab.blueoxen.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?GrassRootsPeerReview
>>
>>Feel free to change it so that it's true to your original intent.
>
>
> Forgot to mention something: Jon Cheyer originally drew me into his
> conversation with Brian on grass roots peer review with the question,
> "What would you call the underlying pattern?" I didn't have a good
> answer for him at the time, but now that I think about it, I think I
> do: TellAFriend.
>
> http://collab.blueoxen.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?TellAFriend
>
> I first came up with the idea of this pattern while thinking about how
> to generate shared motivation or SharedIntensity in an asynchronous
> environment. I describe this in my blog:
>
> http://www.eekim.com/blog/collaboration/asyncmotivation.html#nid2S
>
> It's much easier to generate SharedIntensity in a synchronous
> environment, as people who attended tonight's gathering will attest.
>
> -Eugene
> (02)
--
This message is archived at: (03)
http://collab.blueoxen.net/forums/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=yak&i=3F216F19.20607@fluxent.com (04)
|