I also like Moz, but JavaScript and XUL are not tools I want to work with. (01)
Jack Park wrote:
> There is some evidence that http://sf.net/projects/columba is headed in
> that direction, but I have yet to get it to work!
> Also like (very much!) the Mozilla client, but, perhaps the most
> extensible way is to build a Web-based system so that the browser is
> always the client and we can do whatever we like wih the HTML.
>
> Jack
>
> Bill Seitz wrote:
>
>> Now all we need is a good and extensible email client.
>>
>> Jack Park wrote:
>>
>>> I stumbled on a couple of papers on the Web that, I think, illuminate
>>> some background thinking related to the recent threads here regarding
>>> email clients.
>>>
>>> These papers are all in google (some in several places):
>>> "Email as a habitat"
>>> "Taking email to task: The design and evaluation of a task
>>> managementet centered email tool"
>>> "CAFE: a Conceptual Model for Managing Information in Electronic Mail"
>>> "Email Visualization to Aid Communication"
>>>
>>> and these related papers:
>>> " The Lifestreams Approach to Reorganizing the Information World"
>>> "Lifestreams: An Alternative to the Desktop Metaphor"
>>>
>>> Incidentally, if you happen to be MS-abled, a Lifestreams client
>>> costs about $30.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Jack
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> (02)
--
This message is archived at: (03)
http://collab.blueoxen.net/forums/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=yak&i=3F1570FD.4090405@fluxent.com (04)
|