Eugene Eric Kim <eekim@blueoxen.org> writes: (01)
% I had coffee with Dorai today, and was inspired to write down an idea
% that I've been toying with for a while. It's for a Wiki that
% autolinks pages based on an ontology rather than on WikiWords or
% FreeLinks. My notes are at: (02)
% http://www.eekim.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?MarkupFreeAutoLinkingWiki (03)
So the things that are different on a
on a autolinking wiki is that the words that are first class
entities are the Ontology and not the WikiWords. (04)
In my mind, the WikiWord is the mechanism for making
syntactic marker that this is a first class item. (05)
If you could run perl -pi -e 's/my first class wiki word/MyWikiWord/'
on all the pages, how would this be different than the ontological base? (06)
If I have a wiki, I should be able to find: (07)
Define WikiWishList (08)
* All of the WikiWords - WikiWordIndex (09)
How is this different than an ontology? (010)
* All of the defined WikiWords - DefinedWikiWordIndex (011)
* All the undefined, but referenced WikiWords - UndefinedWikiWordIndex (012)
* WikiWords need WikiWord synonyms, so that concepts can be
collapsed. Wiki (013)
* WikiWords need to have a facets, so that you can define
subareas - WikiFacets (014)
* BulkWikiWordSubstitute - where could run
perl -pi -e 's/my first class wiki word/MyWikiWord/'
on all the pages. (015)
EndWord (016)
Why is ToolsForCollaboration or CollaborativeTools
worse than tools for collaboration or collaborative tools? (017)
I find that the ExplicitWikiWord Syntax is useful to show
what is a first class item. (018)
What do you gain by not having this syntax marker? (019)
What do you loose when you do have it? (020)
-----
John Sechrest . Helping people use
. computers and the Internet
. more effectively
.
. Internet: sechrest@peak.org
.
. http://www.peak.org/~sechrest (021)
--
This message is archived at: (022)
http://collab.blueoxen.net/forums/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=tools-yak&i=200408072047.i77Klsm22505@jas.peak.org (023)
|