tools-yak
[Top] [All Lists]

[tools-yak@collab] Radeox opinions/problems?

To: tools-yak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Murray Altheim <m.altheim@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 19:08:02 +0100
Message-id: <40744382.9050208@open.ac.uk>
Hi all,    (01)

Just wondering if anyone's had much experience with Radeox, the
Java wiki rendering engine. I'm pretty likely to stop any further
work on extending APT as a wiki language, instead simply adopting
Radeox, which does have modifiable syntax facilities. It seems a
shame to reinvent the wheel, given Radeox's availability.    (02)

I'd be interested to know any positives or negatives experience
in using Radeox. In looking at the code itself, it looks pretty
solid, and the fact that it doesn't use hardwired syntax and has
a macro ability is a plus.    (03)

Thanks,    (04)

Murray    (05)

......................................................................
Murray Altheim                    http://kmi.open.ac.uk/people/murray/
Knowledge Media Institute
The Open University, Milton Keynes, Bucks, MK7 6AA, UK               .    (06)

   An Australian scientist says studying the kangaroo genome might
   help scientists modify genes in cows so that they produce highly
   nutritious milk.
   http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3604045.stm    (07)

   Do we really want this kind of nonsense? What animal has more
   common sense than genetic scientists, such that we can implant
   a gene or two?    (08)

-- 
This message is archived at:    (09)

http://collab.blueoxen.net/forums/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=tools-yak&i=40744382.9050208@open.ac.uk    (010)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>