I write to minciu_sodas_en@yahoogroups.com, but also share my proposal
with many groups who have helped. Thank you! Andrius,
http://www.ms.lt, ms@ms.lt
-------------------------------------------------- (01)
Umesh, Franz,
Thank you for your letters!
Umesh I've included you amongst our list of prospective investigators.
Franz, I've hit up against a wall of 10 pages. But I snuck in two words
about building on email and RSS/Echo. Thank you for your energy! (02)
I include below my final draft. Thank you to all for your good
thoughts, spoken and unspoken. (03)
I look forward to new topics. I invite you to bring them here. What
are you working on? (04)
Thank you, (05)
Andrius (06)
Andrius Kulikauskas
Minciu Sodas
http://www.ms.lt
ms@ms.lt (07)
----------------------------------------------
Social Networking Kit
(optimized for marginal connectivity)
by which activists may be
heard, found, informed, helped, integrated.
---------------------------------------------- (08)
Proposed by Minciu Sodas, ms@ms.lt, www.ms.lt (09)
1. Sector of interest and application category (010)
Human rights. Collaboration. (011)
2. Abstract/overview (012)
We wish for activists to participate effectively in the global Internet
society. No matter how robust or marginal our Internet access, we want
to work alongside each other, both online and offline. We wish to
present ourselves through our stories and patterns, find each other
through our projects and initiatives, follow information on the same
topics but in different volumes, target our help with a web of
references, and integrate our efforts with a culture of open investigation. (013)
Our strategy is to develop custom solutions for 125 individual activists
with marginal access so that we learn of many effective ways they might
participate in Internet society. We will build an open source engine for
web services so as to deliver our best solutions in centralized ways,
much as webmail is today. We will incubate social entrepreneurs to sell
extensions and updates for our engine, and to leverage the business
value of our global movement of activists, coders, investigators,
organizers, so that our success is self-sustaining. (014)
3. Detailed description of project (015)
For many of us, the Internet is a global civil society where we find
people of shared concerns and different outlooks, build global teams and
personal relationships, learn about each other and work together to do
good, have fun, make a living, be in touch. (016)
Silicon Valley designs for abundant connectivity, with the promise that
in short time, all of us will benefit. Yet the bandwidth requirements
for full participation grow likewise! We have an expanding "middle
class" of those who have Internet access, but only within limits. (017)
We think of marginal Internet access as any limitations to the
always-on, at-home, high-speed, fixed-rate, real-time, take-with-you,
multi-channel, multimedia access that many of us take for granted. We
wish to help individual activists make effective use of marginal access,
which in many places means paying per minute, staying up after midnight,
working from a center, or using a slow line. (018)
Social Networking Kit (019)
There is a need for design, now rather than later, that treats the
people with the worst access as the most valuable people, the ones that
we should work hardest to include. We will trouble ourselves to do so
if we value working both independently and openly. Working
independently, we tap into our self-direction. Working openly, sharing
our work-in-progress, we mesh ourselves into the social fabric. Our
goal is that, even with marginal connectivity, we might work alongside
each other in some basic ways: (020)
·
Hear us! Collection of stories and patterns. We make sense of life
through our personal stories as real people. We need simple systems for
documenting the wisdom of our experience. How might technology
enthusiasts assist those who have something to say? Weblogs are an
advance in simplicity, but we need to adapt such solutions for offline
users who might work to collect stories and extract patterns.
·
Find us! Directory of initiatives. We inspire each other simply by
expressing what we are trying to accomplish. We need ways to share
information amongst existing directories, propagate the initiatives of
offline activists, and work with such directories offline, so that we
might be aware of each other.
·
Inform us! Radio of information. We can interact as a group when we have
shared information. However, we have quite different tolerances for the
amount of information that we are able to receive and digest. We should
get the channels we want at the volumes we desire: one item per month,
five per day, or twenty per hour. A system could pull new information
from groups, blogs, wikis, websites, Google, and then prioritize it,
with help from a human editor, so that no matter how many or few items
we receive, at least we all get the ones deemed most important.
·
Help us! Web of references. Wealth is relationships, so we help
ourselves by getting to know and integrating each other. Business
networking venues such as Ryze and Ecademy are showing the way, and we
should have offline tools for managing our participation. We should make
good use of kind words for others, and frustrations with ourselves.
Discussion groups provide enormous context for verifying who we are, and
what we are getting done. In a distributed manner, we might document who
helps who, and know how our help can reach the most distant people, and
the many connections that we might support and strengthen.
·
Integrate us! Handbook for investigations. We may have the Internet, but
we are not connected to each other until we ask questions that turn on
our minds, turn up our hearts. Let us learn the art of organizing by
investigating. What is a question that I don't know the answer to? What
belief do I take as my hypothesis, and am willing to challenge? How can
I investigate so that all might contribute thoughts? Our projects,
reexpressed as investigations, can touch and involve many more people,
the global community. We can create a handbook for investigations, with
examples of self-learning, including templates that may be simple enough
to become viral. (021)
We think of this functionality, taken together, as a Social Networking
Kit. We propose a strategy for providing this functionality to people
with even marginal Internet access. (022)
Fractal Movement (023)
Our fundamental challenge is the human engineering so that our activists
find such functionality useful, and their provision is self-sustaining.
We seek to create not only a toolkit, but a culture for encouraging and
integrating individual activists. We have no use for tools created in a
vacuum. Instead, we need a movement for providing all manner of
customizations, tweaks, scripts, workarounds, fixes, macros, routines to
accommodate our projects and constraints. (024)
If we are to design effectively, then we need to focus on what is most
important, which is that our minds be alive, free, whole, comfortable,
egoless, exact, eternal, as Christopher Alexander writes of architecture
in "The Timeless Way of Building". It is not enough for our tools to be
configurable. We need coders to optimize them for us, to make them work
just right for our situation, in ways that are not standard. We need to
think as hackers. (025)
How can we afford to pair activists and coders? Only if we meet each
other half-way. This is our fundamental design principle! We must rely
on the people who work from internal motivation. How can we know who
they are? Because they demonstrate that, despite life's demands, they
are able to make time to "work for free" on their own projects that
contribute to the public wealth. Consequently, we know that if we invest
in them in ways that further their projects, they will share with us the
very best they have. (026)
We propose a fractal distribution of resources to catalyze a movement
that might further sustain itself. Amongst those who "work for free", we
will find 125 individuals with marginal Internet access who would like
help to participate effectively in Internet society. We will also find
125 coders, 25 investigators, 5 organizers and 1 director to provide
that help and build on it. (027)
We will work openly, so that we might find even more (625 !) people who
might help in small ways as volunteers. We will grant hundreds of
attractive free gifts, such as licenses to TheBrain, an $80 value,
provided by TheBrain Technologies, and also memberships to the Minciu
Sodas laboratory, to people who help our coders and activists.
Each of our coders will receive $160, which may be thought of as an
attractive stipend for four weeks of part-time work for a student in
Lithuania, Bosnia, Africa or Mexico. They will be asked to offer custom
service to one individual, which may involve some training,
administrating, data managing, interface design, coding, but also
organizing. For example, a coder might serve a village elder by finding
a high school whose students might record their stories, and improvising
a system for getting them onto the Web. Coders are paid for their
correspondence, in the public domain, that documents the solutions they
are trying out. (028)
Our investigators will serve as mentors for our coders. They may
typically be software developers who agree to apply their talents and
creations to serve those with marginal access. An investigator openly
explores a question that they do not know the answer to, perhaps one
related to user requirements. They help the coders think more deeply,
and document solutions that might be more broadly applied. Each
investigator works part-time for six to nine months and receives $800.
Each of our organizers coordinates a cluster of investigators and
coders, focusing on some geographical region, and responsible for one of
the modules of our toolkit. We do not expect a software deliverable, but
rather an open design process that builds on successes serving
individuals, attracts new funding from individuals and enterprises,
sparks projects that serve those with marginal access, shares resources
and generates synergy with the other clusters, and makes clear what
functionality might be offered more generally. Organizers receive $4,000
for four quarters of work. (029)
Our director is responsible for focusing and projecting our vision so
that we might all support each other through our efforts. This includes
teaching the concept of "organizing by investigating", establishing a
framework for working openly, checking that we actually help not hurt,
and attracting related work from the business community. Our director
will coordinate our resources and endeavors so that we make real
progress for all of our modules, but develop at least two of them to the
point where it is clear how they might work as Application Service
Providers. Our director receives $20,000 for five quarters of work. (030)
In this way, $100,000, with 20% reserved for administration (fees,
authorship taxes, discretionary expenses for visas, books, etc.),
jumpstarts a wide synergetic movement that addresses the problem of
marginal access for many people in many lands for many reasons. (031)
We intend to showcase the effectiveness of working openly so that
private interests might benefit from funding public work. We have found
that coders can work in much smaller increments (such as $200) when they
work under public licenses. This opens up a market for custom
programming under simple terms: pay in advance, and if you are not
happy, then you can have all or part go to your favorite charity. Our
movement also illustrates the value of team-building. For $2,000 we can
provide a corporate thinker with a global team of 30 people (1 coach for
working openly at $1,000, 5 instigators at $200, 25 innovators attracted
by free prizes), and at the same time help innovators get corporate
leads. Likewise, we will market to enterprises the opportunity to fund
larger teams at $15,000 or $100,000. (032)
We want a toolkit for working voluntarily, and so we invest in people
who will work voluntarily to build it. More than just tools, we will
gain a movement for investing in voluntary work, and best of all, a
virtuous cycle of better tools, investment and work. (033)
Incubator for Web Service Entrepreneurs (034)
How might we make the best solutions widely available? Application
Service Provider solutions suggest themselves as they make effective use
of Internet connectivity. Imagine that we are uploading new and updated
Wiki pages that we have worked on off-line. At some point we will
connect to the Internet and send our pages along with instructions such
as "add this page" and "update that page". These instructions may be
executed through an API or by means of tricky workarounds. They will be
vulnerable to fail, as they will depend on the particular Wiki, whose
code and layout can change. It would be very helpful to have an ASP take
care of these details in a unified way. This makes it simple to manage
updates, fix bugs and expand functionality. In this way, the problem is
broken down into two parts - a variety of simple off-line interfaces are
built for generating data and instructions, and upon connection, a
sophisticated ASP service executes the instructions and uploads and
downloads the data. (035)
If organized thoughtfully, this means that the user can work with a
simplification of the Web. Instead of learning the intricacies of the
different syntaxes of the wide variety of Wikis, they can simply work
with a single Wiki syntax, and the ASP will handle the conversion.
Likewise for posting to a blog, or moderating a discussion group, etc.
By rethinking Web activity so that users with marginal access may
participate, we are creating a framework of activity that may be
executed by agents! (036)
This also suggests a business model that builds on open standards and
free universal service. A common open source core engine might be
released regularly for free, say, every three months. ISPs and other
hosting services could offer this to their customers, just as they offer
free webmail. This would simplify the costs of distributing the
functionality to a wide group of people. Some ISPs would be afraid this
might reduce Internet usage. But others would think more strategically,
that this would make the Internet useful to a much wider group of people
who will grow to want better access and be able to afford it. (Note that
there are ISPs in the developing world which offer local mirroring of
requested sites, for example.) The ASP service will naturally break as
things change. Those hosts who want to compete on this would be willing
to pay for prompt updates. There are also many ways to vary and refine
this business model. (037)
The greatest challenge is finding an entrepreneur who might offer such a
service of promptly updating and steadily improving the engine. Any
entrepreneur who cares to serve this segment of the market is not
primarily interested in money. A social entrepreneur will be attracted
to offer such a technically involved service only if it fits nicely with
their greater vision and values. This depends very much on the details
of the service, the people they can serve and work with, and the
evolution of their own vision. It is of key importance to incubate such
entrepreneurs. And because there is so much for them to think about, it
is sensible to assume that there will be several such entrepreneurs, so
that we not rely on any single one. (038)
We want our social entrepreneurs to feel they are stewards of the code
base, the design fits with their business models, and they or their
programmers are comfortable modifying and extending it. For this purpose
it is best that the social entrepreneurs select the programmers who
create the engine. Furthermore, not merely one programmer, but
preferably several should have their hand in it, to make its mindset
more explicitly shared. (039)
Another pitfall that we face is that we can build a system that we love
in theory but that nobody actually wants to use in practice. We want the
functionality to serve the activists. Therefore we have our five cluster
leaders of our fractal movement express the functionality that they
want, and provide them each with a budget ($5,000) that they can
dedicate to one of our social entrepreneurs, iterating as in Extreme
Programming. (040)
Finally, we need an overall plan, so that we all have a clear idea of
what our system is in its basic functionality, and ways it might evolve.
We will devote $10,000 for the coding of the core, and $10,000 for
specifying the system and data formats, and managing the development. (041)
Programmers will not receive final payment until they have documented
their code. Our work in cycles will help us continuously test our engine
and improve its developer's documentation. Minciu Sodas will devote
$10,000 to polishing up the final engine, completing testing and
developer's documentation. We will also organize an additional cluster
for $15,000 consisting of 5 investigators and 25 coders with successful
projects so they might help with testing and user's documentation.
Finally, we budget $5,000 to help our social entrepreneurs make
connections with prospective clients. (042)
4. Description of technology involved (043)
We are encouraged by the work of Andy Rabagliati and others in creating
the Wizzy Digital Courier . Wizzy allows students at Eshowe Junior
School in South Africa to write emails and create websites during the
day, and then send them all out late at night, when the rates are fixed.
Alternatively, outgoing material can be transferred to memory and
delivered by bicycle to a neighboring school, and likewise with incoming
material. (044)
Our goal is to rethink this concept so that we might meet a wide variety
of individual needs for robust participation. Our coders will create
solutions that will necessarily be eclectic, making use of their
favorite programming languages, and improvising by providing training,
swapping hardware, scraping pages, calling APIs, creating databases,
designing interfaces, writing scripts, installing software, organizing
volunteers, asking for donations or permissions, corresponding with
developers, sharing solutions. (045)
We envision that for our ASP engine we will use Python to build a
language for calling the instructions (like "spider a website", "send
out mail"). Social entrepreneurs add functionality through modules
written in the languages of their choice (Perl, PHP-MySQL, C, Java,
etc.) and by creating a variety of simple clients for preparing the data
formats and instructions. We will create a cross-platform engine, but
our intent will be to run on Linux. Our engine will be open source,
preferably public domain, and will allow proprietary modules and
extensions. There will be an open data format (instructions plus data),
based on Unicode and XML, building on email and RSS/Echo, that can be
created by all kinds of clients (for example, a Microsoft Access
application using the royalty free run-time engine). This architecture
will be, in a sense, an interface for participation through the web,
expressing all the kinds of things that you would like to do, so that it
might be done asynchronously. (046)
5. Description of user group, including expected location(s) and use
scenarios (047)
We look forward to serving all manner of activists who would like to
make effective use of marginal Internet access. In particular, we will
focus our efforts on four groups that have different kinds of marginal
access. (048)
Africa. Many places have absolutely no access, yet might exchange CDs
by mail. OneVillage.Biz is pairing university students (humanist and
technologist) to bring to their villages a computer with wifi Internet
access, which is used as a shared resource. (049)
The Balkans. The telecottage movement is creating bases of activity for
social entrepreneurs, both managers and customers. We optimize the
division of labor between home computers and the slow, pay-per-minute
access at the telecottages. (050)
The Tamil world. The Tamil people live in many lands under many
conditions, as businessmen, refugees, servants and programmers. We
encourage the spread of social and technical skills for leveraging the
economic, cultural and educational potential. (051)
Lithuania and Belarus. Various awkward ways of accessing the Internet
are coming to the Lithuanian countryside: slow, expensive, after
midnight. We organize a network for traveling self-learners, especially
for free thinkers from Belarus. (052)
6. Description of civil society application for project (053)
Our open laboratory, Minciu Sodas, serves and organizes independent
thinkers around the world. We bring together our individual projects
around endeavors that foster our shared value of "caring about thinking". (054)
Civil society organizations thrive through the individual activists,
thinkers, organizers, investigators, self-learners who they include and
encourage. Often, these individuals feel isolated, rejected, depressed,
and they greatly appreciate the energy that they get from each other.
Their activity gives life along the entire spectrum of human rights. (055)
In Lithuania, we have organized 150 thinkers, making special efforts to
reach out to the countryside in Dzukija, near Belarus. We helped
villager Saulius Sakalas get Internet access through his mobile phone,
and create a website for his countryside cabin. We travel to help our
neighbors in Belarus develop modest ways to overcome their isolation,
they want to create a website for canary breeders. We now organize in
the Lithuanian countryside a network of independent thinkers that would
serve as a base for research, and could be visited by traveling
self-learners who wish to think and grow as investigators and organizers. (056)
We have also helped George Christian Jeyaraj for four years while he was
in and out of Lithuanian refugee camps. We helped him teach himself
progamming and participate through the Internet when available. Through
him we have connected with Bala Pillai and the online Tamil world where
there is much civic potential. (057)
This summer, our director Andrius Kulikauskas made the effort to reach
out to find Islamic independent thinkers in Bosnia. The issues lead him
to the Serb controlled region. There he met a young unemployed Muslim
without Internet access but with a home computer. He tutored him how to
teach himself web design, so that he could work through a friend who has
a hosting service in another city. Later, he visited the youths of
kuda.org in Novi Sad, Serbia. Everywhere there is a need to speak more
plainly that the Muslims are victims. We have organized 100 speakers of
Bosnian-Serbian-Croatian. We will work through telecottage managers to
encourage reaching out to other peoples. (058)
Most ambitiously, we work with oneVillage.Biz and their youth networks
to confront the AIDS crisis in Africa. We hope to build a responsive
human web that stretches from villages in Africa, including teachers and
doctors, through regional centers of education, health, business and IT,
to international organizations, business, philanthropic and governmental
networks, all the way to software developers, corporate thinkers, and
even school children throughout the West. Our ability to shift
personal, corporate and governmental resources will be the greatest test
of our Social Networking Kit. (059)
7. Description of team, including countries of origin and previous
software development experience (060)
Leader (061)
Dr.Andrius Kulikauskas (Lithuania/United States of America) has a Ph.D.
in algebraic combinatorics. Since 1995 he has designed database systems
in health care, agriculture, human resources and consulting. He drafted
the Mindset modeling language for interchange of aggregates of thoughts,
and worked for adoption through KMCI, IrDA and XTM. In 1998, he founded
the Minciu Sodas laboratory serving independent thinkers, now
integrating 50 active and 500 passive participants around the world. (062)
Cluster Leaders (063)
Joy Tang (United States of America/China) worked at Cisco Systems in
Government Alliances, Emerging Market Development, Sales Development,
Executive Business Briefing and Marketing. She is the Founder of
www.oneVillage.biz with youth in Ghana, Nigeria, Kenya and South Africa
responding to the AIDS crisis with holistic IT solutions for villages.
Joy leads our cluster for "web presence", especially serving Africa
villages with the help of students, and active at MindEcos. (064)
Franz Nahrada (Austria), the head of Globally Integrated Village
Environment (GIVE), is the organizer of a decade of global village
events, and Computers for Cameroon www.vum.at He is a visionary for
activating a network of villages across the Balkans. Franz leads our
cluster for "directory of initiatives" and community profiling,
especially working with EUTA, the European Union of Telecottage
Associations, to encourage initiatives at telecottages in Bosnia and Serbia. (065)
Shannon Clark (United States of America) founded www.jigzaw.com offering
custom software development, technology consultation, auction support
services, AI based software for Information Extraction and Integration.
He is Events chair for Ryze business networking in Chicago, Illinois,
USA. Shannon leads our cluster for "radio of knowledge", rallying
efforts of social software developers inside and outside the "greater
Silicon Valley" through the Blue Oxen Collaboration collaboratory. (066)
Rytis Umbrasas (Lithuania) worked as a high school IT teacher, and now
as a systems administrator. He promotes the Lithuanian character sets,
and is an IT mentor for teachers and villagers, such as Saulius Sakalas.
Rytis leads our cluster for "handbook for investigations" by organizing
a network of villages in Lithuania which self-learners might travel
through, especially from Belarus. (067)
Neil McEvoy (United Kingdom) founded in 1999 The App Tap for creating
web services, and in 2001 the Genesis Forum for organizing agile,
OnDemand networks of workers, especially through Ecademy. Neil leads our
cluster for "web of references" to establish public identities for
activists to multiply support for their activity in Africa, the Balkans,
and the Tamil world. He works through Ecademy and Michael Wolff's ki-Net. (068)
Social Entrepreneurs (069)
Bala Pillai (Australia/Malaysia) as Principal of www.apic.net is a
pioneer since 1995 for the online Tamil community, www.tamil.net, and
Asian ISP services. He is an innovator in fostering acumen for forming
human networks. (070)
Flemming Funch (France/Denmark) is a web database programmer and systems
administrator. He founded the New Civilization Network online community
in 1995 and designs its online environment. (071)
Vladimir Maruna (Serbia and Montenegro) leads teams and manages projects
in digital assets management, query building, business portals. He
consults for the multimedia center www.kuda.org and realizes art
projects as part of an art/math/technology trio. (072)
Investigators: People from around the world have expressed the desire
to participate as investigators: Suhit Anantula (India), Rasa
Armanauskaite (Lithuania), Asomiddin Atoev (Tajikistan), Stanko Blatnik
(Slovenia), Algis Cibulskis (Lithuania), Joe Damal (USA), Giedre Danyte
(Lithuania), George Christian Jeyaraj (Lithuania/Sri Lanka), Ike Maboe
(South Africa), Matthias Masawe (Tanzania), Moses Mwale (Zambia),
Olumide Omowumi Obidiran (Nigeria), Kennedy Onyango (Kenya), Kafui
Prebbie (Ghana), Umesh Rashmi Rohatgi (USA/India), Denis Rojo (Italy),
Nenad Sabert (Serbia and Montenegro), Rudi von Staden (South Africa),
Dalia Steponeniene (Lithuania), Gleb Tiurin (Russia), John Tobler (USA),
Raimundas Vaitkevicius (Lithuania), Neil Williams (South Africa). (073)
8. Budget/timeline (074)
20,000 = 125 x 160 for coders serving activists.
20,000 = 25 x 800 for investigators mentoring coders.
20,000 = 5 x 4,000 for organizers coordinating investigators.
20,000 for director integrating organizers.
20,000 for administration, transfer fees, discretionary expenses.
100,000 USD = Subtotal for a Movement to Serve Activists. (075)
10,000 for specifying the system and data formats, and managing the
development.
10,000 for coding the core engine.
25,000 = 5 x 5,000 for coding the desired functionality.
10,000 for polishing the engine and developer documentation.
15,000 for a cluster devoted to testing and user documentation.
5,000 for helping our social entrepreneurs find prospective customers
and funders.
75,000 USD = Subtotal for an ASP Engine Operated by Social Entrepreneurs. (076)
5,000 to Ian Bruk for sponsoring work on this proposal.
5,000 to Andrius Kulikauskas for writing and organizing this proposal.
5,000 to Andy Rabagliati for pioneering the Wizzy Digital Courier.
5,000 to developers of open source code that proves useful in our work.
20,000 USD = Subtotal for Giving Back to Those Who Gave. (077)
195,000 USD Total for a Social Networking Kit. (078)
Timeline: Jan 2004 - Dec 2005. (079)
Jan 2004 - Mar 2005. Five clusters work in parallel to serve activists.
Apr 2005 - Dec 2005. One cluster works on testing and user documentation. (080)
Jan 2004 - Jun 2004. Specifying the requirements, data formats.
Jul 2004 - Oct 2004. Coding the core engine.
Nov 2004 - Aug 2005. Coding the desired functionality, roughly five
two-month cycles. (Note - we may accelerate development, and also
develop in parallel, if our social entrepreneurs find clear market
opportunity.)
Sep 2005 - Dec 2005. Polishing engine and developer documentation. (081)
9. Co-funders (if any) (082)
We are searching for co-funders. We are coordinating our efforts with
oneVillage Foundation and the European Union of Telecottage
Associations. In Lithuania, we will apply for EUREKA funding to build
and commercialize our ASP engine, and for PHARE funding to develop our
network in the villages. TheBrain Technologies provides us with free
software for prizes, and we will look for more such sponsors. We are
offering team-building services to corporations that might sponsor
related work. (083)
--
This message is archived at: (084)
http://collab.blueoxen.net/forums/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=tools-yak&i=3F798CF6.6060207@ms.lt (085)
|