Eugene Eric Kim wrote: (01)
> I'm thinking of having our mailing list software doing the
> transclusion for you in the e-mail that is distributed, but having it
> show up as a real transclusion in the archived version. That is, you
> get a cut-and-paste copy in your e-mail, but if you view it from the
> archives, you can see the transcluded source by clicking on the purple
> "T".
>
The first part makes sense to me. The server does the transclusion,
so what you see in the message is the text, pasted in by the server. (02)
I don't quite see what's happening in the archive, though. Is the
text also pasted in there, with "T" after that it takes you to the
source of that text? That would be good. (03)
(When I first started writing, I got the idea that *only* the "T"
would be there, making it a link rather than a transclusion.) (04)
Internally, though, I presume that the archive is storing a
transclusion link ("trans link"?) which is processed when the
server is delivering the page, yes? (05)
--
This message is archived at: (06)
http://collab.blueoxen.net/forums/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=tools-yak&i=3F148C2D.20407@sun.com (07)
|